Monday, December 31, 2007

To Change China by Jonathan Spence (Nonfiction Book 2002)

So yes, another historical, non-fiction book for the list. This one was a tad interesting because it had writings from people who visited China from as way back as the 17th century. I always wondered if people really spoke in that odd manner; sorta like being forced to read Shakespeare and make a wholehearted attempt at comprehending what the man was talking about.

For these few people who did leave behind some writings, I’d have to say that they indeed use very odd diction as well as interesting sentence structures, some of which I would never be able to produce in any amount of time.

The book’s purpose was to show how different people at different points in history tried to change or influence China or Chinese society in ways to make them more western and modern. Although many failed early on, some were more successful in later years. The book itself was a little dry, but the original writings that were used in the book were what stood out. Again, reading a firsthand account, such as something out of a journal entry is much more appealing than reading something that a modern author elaborated on. It would be just like reading Napoleon’s journal and seeing what the guy was thinking when he decided to invade Russia back in 1812.

One thing that did piss me off was reading about how a lot of the earlier peeps were there, only to evangelize and spread Christianity throughout the known world. “People shouldn’t meddle in other peoples’ business.” That’s my motto, so it ticks me off to read such things, even if it happened hundreds of years ago.
Rating - Mid

Wednesday, December 26, 2007

The Seeker: The Dark Is Rising (Adventure Drama 2007)

I'm ashamed to admit that I even watched this. It was bad, like really really bad. Susan Cooper is a horrible writer if she admits to writing this. I've vote for a plagiarism admission if I were her. Everything was horrible: acting, plot, characters, special effects, etc. I mean how many times did I see The Rider nay his horse? I'm thinking 30, but that may be a conservative number. Alexander Ludwig might also think that he's the shit, since this is his 7th film, but does he realize that every middle school in the America has a guy that looks like him?
Rating - F

Gears of War (3rd Person Action PC Game 2007)

You know what? I don't like losing. Actually, I despise losing. That's why I don't play dumb sports like basketball or baseball, because I suck at them and I know it. But one thing I don't suck at are computer games, so it pisses me off when I play something that is designed to only frustrate and waste time. Why would the proud makers of this jewel make the game play so lame and tedious? Because they are tards; tards that have no sense of what is fun and what a good game is all about.

I'm usually not a fan of ports just because they always seem like a lamer version of the original, even though the game is more/less the same. Since this was one of the flagship games for the Xbox 360, I thought it would be at least O.K., but of course I was wrong.

The first few levels were fun, but then I began to realize that it was all the same. Every level was just a tweaked version of the one before; very repetitive and very boring. There were only two positive things about this game: the blood and the dialogue. Almost everything else sucked, such as the guns, mobs, boss fights, game play, levels, teammates whose AI was dumber than shit, and of course the ultra-hard sections that were made specifically to have you die 50+ times in a row. I can appreciate difficult levels, but not ones that have so many cards stacked against you. I suppose some would call overcoming these obstacles "skill", but I certainly don't.

So today, for the first time since I played my old school Nintendo, I remembered what I hated about console games and why I turned to computer games so long ago. Consoles suck because they are 100% linear, have next to no replay value, and difficulty is derived from a simple equation of how much more HP a boss has and how many times you have to deal damage to it before it kills you. I tried to keep on playing to see what the end cinematic would look like, but I lost all interest in continuing on.
Rating - Low

Sunday, December 23, 2007

Warlords (Foreign Chinese War Drama 2007)

This was a Chinese new release that had a lot of big hitters in it like Jet Li, Takeshi Kaneshiro, and Andy Lau. The first two were in films like Hero and House of Flying Daggers, but I don’t think the third guy’s films have ever made it to the US. They are all pretty famous on this end of the world though.

I was very much looking forward to this movie because it had battles set in the Qing Dynasty, which I find the most interesting out of all of the Chinese dynasties. I especially liked the armor from that era. Sad how almost none of them survived through the turmoil of the 20th century.

This film's story was about brotherhood and how selfishness and break apart any relationship among people. The action was O.K., but there wasn’t enough of it. The director should've watched Braveheart or Gladiator and gained some insight as to what a good battle scene should look like. The plot didn't have many flaws from the storytelling perspective, but it was totally a downer and certainly didn't brighten anyone’s day.

I don’t know if it will ever reach the US, but if it does, I doubt anyone will be impressed. This was yet another movie that had a lot of potential, but it was lacking in so many areas that I find it hard to give it any sort of props.
Rating - C

Friday, December 21, 2007

The Kingdom (Action 2007)

Well the trailer for this one looked very good, but unfortunately it didn't live up to my expectations. Good thing is that Jamie Foxx is still a badass and I continue to enjoy his acting.

This film felt like Syriana mixed in with Bad Boys. The background setting was there, a whole crapload of action was there, but where was the plot? I suppose it was much like that of other action films with their highly linear plot line, but the fact that the setting was in Saudi Arabia made it seem like a higher-quality movie could have been produced.

Jennifer Garner looked distraught throughout the film, while Jason Bateman supplied a steady stream of quirky, one-sentence comments. They can hardly be considered supporting actors. One good thing about this film was that the explosions were probably the best "bomb" special effects I've seen to date. There were 2 in the beginning of the movie that looked so real that I had to go back and watch it several more times to see how they pulled it off. I still don't know how they did it either...

This was an overall average action flick, but it was definitely marketed as something better. Maybe next time they can find a better writer.
Rating - C

Tuesday, December 18, 2007

The Brave One (Drama 2007)

It's been a long time since I've seen Jodie Foster in a movie. The last good one had to be Contact, and that's probably considered old school by today's standards. But I got to say, this here film was pretty good. You probably know what the ending is like, based solely on my approval of it.

Yeah this movie is about how one woman dealt with the assault and murder of her fiance. I think it accurately demonstrated the emotional feelings that would've come from such an experience. I'm no psychologist, but everything seemed fairly believable and justified.

The tag line for this film is " How many wrongs to make it right?", and my answer to that is "As many as it takes". It's crappy how our legal system can do so much to protect those who don't deserve that type of respect. I'm down with vigilantism, but I can see why our system frowns upon it. Sometimes its necessary because not everyone plays by the same rule book.
Rating - A

Sunday, December 16, 2007

Rescue Dawn (Drama 2006)

I haven't seen a Nam P.O.W. film since the whole Missing in Action series back in the 80s, but surprisingly enough, those old school films totally beat out this one.

I'm a fan of Christian Bale so it certainly wasn't his acting that brought down this movie; the story is what lacked. Since this was based on a true story, I'm not punishing it for the plot, but more of how it was presented. The director tried to concentrate on the mental turmoil of the prisoners in the camp, but he didn't really do a good job with that. If this was the road that the director wanted to go down, he should've gone balls-out and done it. Because of the lack of skill in regards to using the "mental anguish" technique, the rest of the film fell flat on its face.

This wasn't as bad as a regular bad movie, but it did have a lot of potential that was not utilized.
Rating - C

Saturday, December 15, 2007

Crysis (FPS PC Game 2007)

Ever since its unveiling at E3, this game was labeled as one of the more anticipated games of the year. With the ultra-realistic graphics and a strong reputation as being the creators of Farcry, Crytek used their established beachhead to launch their new island FPS. Was this game all that it was supposed to be? Yes and no, but it was only a very small no.

To begin, let’s just say that I really like the direction that games are currently heading in. It’s no longer pointless shoot’em ups, but instead these games feel much more like playing within a movie. I think it all started way back in the day with Half-Life and being employed at Black Mesa, but now this much needed plot background has spread to more than a few other titles.

From the very beginning, Crysis was indeed immersive and plot-driven. You play as a U.S. Special Forces soldier, but you get to wear this nifty exo-suit that allows you to gain various advantages over enemies. This was just enough differentiation to make the game play interesting without totally making it unrealistic and boring. The guns were all fairly standard, as you were only allowed to carry 2 larger rifles and have a double pistol setup as your sidearm. It would’ve been nice to see different pistols like a Magnum or something, but through the whole game you were pretty much stuck with the pistols; that was a little lame.

The sound was good, but on par with other FPS out there. I don't know why they had the North Korean soldiers yelling in very crappy English when they would've realistically been yelling in Korean, but this was indeed one audio faux pas. The UI was very intuitive and easy to get accustomed to, especially all of the rifle modifications. The graphics, being the highlight of the game, were both a blessing and a curse. It was great because when you turned all of the settings up, everything looked so damn sharp. I will very much enjoy playing this game again a few years from now, when video cards can actually handle it. As you might’ve guessed, playing the game with the settings maxed out was 100% unplayable. It took a whole 17 seconds for me to shoot my gun (mouse-click to bang), if you’re in need of a reference. Like always I had to lower the resolution to 1024x768 and have most of the settings on low or medium. It was still fun, but I’m sure I was missing out on some wondrous graphical achievements.

The story was very good, until it got all alien. I don’t know…I like sci-fi stuff as much as the next guy, but somehow it seemed misplaced with this one. I hated being in the alien structure because it felt like I was playing old-school Descent, and I didn’t like that game at all.

The ending was a cliffhanger of sorts so there will be a sequel for sure. Hopefully it will have less alien stuff, although I highly doubt I’ll get my wish. I think I still enjoyed playing Call of Duty 4 more though, but this came in a close second. Overall it was a great game with only a few misgivings.
Rating - High

Wednesday, December 12, 2007

3:10 to Yuma (Western Action 2007)

I’ve always been a fan of good westerns ever since Young Guns and even the "Lonesome Dove" series to some extent. It has been quite a while since anyone has made a western movie though, so that is why I was surprised to see both Russell Crowe and Christian Bale paired together for this film.

This was a nice breath of fresh air considering all of the crap that has come through my DVD drive as of late. It had a nice, solid story with good acting and character development. Crowe’s character was way too “nice” in my opinion though, but it was needed to move the plot forward.

If you’re in the mood for a pretty decent movie then I’d recommend this one, but if you don’t like westerns then I can understand that feeling as well.
Rating - A

Monday, December 10, 2007

Mongol (Foreign Drama 2007)

Russian producers/writers/director making a film about Mongols…humm…what to think. Although I know that the Mongols did conquer a huge chunk of Asia and Russia, it still seems odd for them to make a film about Genghis Khan. Did they do well? No.

To start, this movie was putt putt slow. Yes, it’s nice that they went into the childhood of this notorious conqueror, but #1 who knows if any part of this movie is actually true and #2 Russians can’t make movies. The film was lacking in all respects. I don’t really know how to describe it other than me thinking to myself that the direction this film took was just plain wrong. You might be able to find this in the bargain bin somewhere, but since it’s a foreign flick, hopefully it will be harder to come across.

The fights were sub-par, the armor was lame, the archery was lame, and the CG effects were 5-10 years behind a real movie. Maybe these people should invest their money into making their country not so corrupt and leave the movie making to Hollywood. They tried to make this an epic film, but all they did was create yet another crappy one.
Rating - D

Thursday, December 06, 2007

Half-Life 2: Episode Two (FPS Action PC Game 2007)

Alex and Gordon are back at it again. The story continues from the end of Episode 1, when you were escaping on a train after you blew up the Combine Tower. As expected, the game play, story, sound, and effects were all top notch. This episode seemed to be a little short, but the levels were all very fun. I still don’t think it was fair to package this together in The Orange Box, just because nobody likes to pay for something they already have, but I guess Valve has to look out for #1.

The ending of this episode was yet another cliffhanger, so there will definitely be a 3rd episode. We’ll be waiting for it.
Rating - High

Lions for Lambs (Drama 2007)

This was totally a political film questioning the current state of the US and its foreign policy agenda. It had an all-star cast who took the lead in showing the different perspectives of people affected by government decisions.

It wasn’t a normal film as in having a real plot. It merely had a small group of characters who each represented different levels of the system and how policy is made and executed by policymakers, the press, and the military.

This movie should be played in poli-sci classes because I’m sure the students would have a lot to talk about. Since I watched it alone, with no other opinions floating around, I don’t really have anything to say other than, “bureaucracy is a bitch and it’s the little guys who get screwed in the end.” And this brings me back to my famous saying of how crappy our legislative branch of government is. Rich people making big decisions that will usually make them more rich at the expense of the ignorant and the idealistic members of our population. What type of representative government is that? A corrupt one.
Rating – C

Good Night, and Good Luck. (Drama 2005)

Interesting little film about the McCarthy Era and how the US was totally in an anti-communist mood. Since I never got to this point in history in any of my classes as a student, this was all new to me.

The movie was fairly good, as it displayed the life of Edward R. Murrow and how he had no fear in questioning the improperness of McCarthy and his witch hunts during the 1950s. It was a well done film with great acting. Funny how George Clooney directed it. Maybe some actors do have other talents.
Rating – B

Redacted (Drama 2007)

Well this was a crappy movie. It was a recreation of an event that was reported on the news pertaining to the rape and murder of a family in Iraq. I think I remember that a few soldiers were prosecuted, but besides that, I don’t know if the film added more stuff to it or if they left some details out.

In a one-liner, this movie was way too one-sided. Although there really isn't another side that can rationalize rape and unjustified murder, a film can be made to be politically charged, and this just seemed to be way towards the left. I'm sure there are many peeps in the military who are slimy characters who lack moral fortitude and have next to no conscience, but this film tried to exploit that to a greater degree.

Many may disagree with me, but I felt that this film wasn’t worth its beans. Yes, we shouldn't be in Iraq. Yes, bad things happen in war. And yes, there are people who function without a moral compass. It’s life…why waste time making a film about something that most people already know?
Rating - D

Tuesday, December 04, 2007

Dan in Real Life (Comedy 2007)

It's nice to see Steve Carell in more films since I like him as an actor much more than, lets say, Will Ferrell. Bad thing is that this script was not very impressive although I did laugh a few times.

The movie was O.K. in most respects, but it wasn't anything special. You have this guy name Dan who is a widower raising 3 daughters. He meets a chick in a bookstore and is smitten. He then drives to a family reunion only to find out that this new flame is the girlfriend of his brother. Drama ensues.

The whole story is very predictable and very plain. Again, nothing really wrong with it, but it brought nothing new to the table. Maybe Steve will get another The 40 Year Old Virgin which will then put him back on the map.
Rating - C

Sunday, December 02, 2007

Nanking (Documentary 2007)

This wasn't your average documentary in terms of format, because they pretty much hired actors to sit in a chair and act like they were the real people who lived through some of the atrocities that happened during WWII. Most of the dialogue was taken from letters and memoirs written by expatriates living in Nanking at the time of the Japanese occupation of the city.

The account of what happened was pretty gruesome and disturbing, but in times of war, all bets are off. During any chaotic time, soldiers from all sides will preform inhumane and unethical acts against an enemy country. I'm sure if we went back in time to the days of the Roman Empire or Alexander the Great, you would find similar acts being committed. But even so, in the more-so civilized world of today, we often hope that ethics and personal values will overcome the intrinsic barbarism that seems to exist in humans.

If you're interested in what happened in Nanking during the Second World War, this film will give you a detailed account of past events. The morale of the movie is that war is bad...for everyone...and that is why we should avoid it at all costs.
Rating - B

Thursday, November 29, 2007

Beowulf (Animated Action 2007)

I'm not sure how much publicity this film had prior to its release, but I didn't know that it even existed. This movie was a mix of storytelling and modern CG modeling. The animation reminded me of Final Fantasy, but with more advanced graphics and effects. I wonder how things will look 10 years from now.

Although I've heard of Beowulf, I'm not familiar with the story, so it was all new to me. To be perfectly honest, this film wasn't really impressive. Sure, the special effects were good and some of the action seemed very life-like, but there wasn't a lot of true character development. There only seemed to be 3 scenes of great importance and the rest of the movie was just filler.

It's getting highish marks on IMDB, but I'll have to disagree with everyone. It really wasn't that good. See for yourself though...it just might float your boat, but it certainly wasn't for me.
Rating - C

Mao Zedong by Jonathan Spence (Book 2006)

Yes, more random reading taking place. Since most of the books I find here are historical in nature, I'm sure that category doesn't interest anyone who is actually checking my site, so I'll keep it short.

This book is one of those small gifts that's usually placed near the checkout line at Barnes and Nobles. Because of this, it will most certainly lack detail, depth, and content. It reads much like a short summary would, rather than an actual book. So maybe that was the intention of the author? Who knows, but what I do know is that I didn't come away with any deeper sense of understanding as to the historical events that affected China for the better portion of the 20th century.

All I know is that this Mao character somehow magically rose through the ranks to become the reigning leader of the country. It never ceases to amaze me when I read something about some random, charismatic person becoming a leader and affecting the lives of millions. Stalin, Lenin, Putin, Hitler, Mao...none of them were the smartest, the most clever, nor the most experienced, but they all managed to consolidate and control governmental and political power in their respective countries. Weird.

Anyway, to be honest, this book wasn't that good. It was much too short and didn't provide enough important details. My time was wasted because I don't remember a damn thing I just read.
Rating - Low

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

Superbad (Comedy 2007)

Prior to leaving this summer, I had heard that this movie gave Knocked Up a run for its money, but I didn't have a chance to go see it. I'll say it now that all the rumors were true.

This movie was crude and hilarious. The dialog was very accurate in terms of HS/college lingo and the subject matter was also on par. I let out pretty hardy laughs on numerous occasions, so that's a very good sign. Like all films, some parts were a little slower and unnecessary, but overall it was a damn funny movie. In my opinion, it didn't beat Knocked Up, but it was definitely the second runner-up.
Rating - A

Monday, November 26, 2007

Sicko (Documentary 2007)

So Michael Moore pumps out yet another controversial film, but this time he's attacking the health care industry. Did he have what it takes to make a compelling argument? I think that a "hell yes" would be in order. For starters, I never trusted insurance companies to begin with because they are a profit-driven industry that only loses money when they are supposed to handle the needs of their clients. This system is kinda jacked because there is a conflict of interest thing going on when the only ways they can make more money is to 1) Get more clients to pay a monthly fee 2) Make it harder for clients to get their insurance payout. Simple logic was illustrated in this film to be exactly what insurance companies in the health care industry do. They would jack regular, working Americans just so they could collect more money. Your only hope is that either you don't get sick or you work for an organization that has a lot of pull, like a State or Federal Agency.

This film opened my eyes to health care in the UK and Canada. I've always heard about their free health care systems, but have never actually seen people on film talk about it. All I got to say about that is that those countries are 1st world, a regular system of capitalism functions there, and people can still be wealthy. Why then are we not also on that bandwagon? Again, this leads to me to start bashing the rich because that is mainly what the problem is. Rich people have a loud voice, and then you combine that with rich companies that can hire lobbyists. With that duo, you have a powerful say in government policies that effectively kills any chance of a federalized health care system. I will probably never make a shit ton of money, but I would rather pay more taxes just so that this aspect of my life would be taken care of. I'm not much of a humanitarian, so I would not be taking this stance for the benefit of all the people who couldn't afford it. I would mainly support this type of system so that a working Joe like me would not be screwed over further down the line.

The whole section on France was a little too much though. A government worker helping out around the house when you're preggers and have a baby? Yeah that seemed to be a waste of resources, but I guess it keeps people employed, right? I don't ever see that happening in the US just because we are all too selfish and I could picture hella people taking advantage of that system...same goes with the 24/7, on-call doctors.

Like all controversial films, there is another side of the coin that hasn't been discussed. Even though Moore did a fantastic job describing how crappy our system is, I would like to see the rebuttal argument coming from a person who is adamantly against federalized health care. Anything that person would say that directly supports the HMOs, the industry, and the rich could be automatically thrown out, but anything else would be fairly interesting. I would love to see a debate on this topic.

The section of this film pertaining to Cuba was a little bit over the top and it seemed staged in my opinion, but that was the only part of this whole documentary that came with any negative baggage.

I like Michael Moore's style of film making though. He dumbs down complex ideas and puts real faces to the lives that are affected by the subject matter. It makes all his movies a lot more convincing and digs up some empathetic feelings from the audience. Good stuff overall.
Rating - A

Sunday, November 25, 2007

Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare (FPS PC Game 2007)

So guess what DVD man has? Software! Yay...yes I was totally just bored out of my mind, wandering around looking for something to do, when I so happened to peer into a box that he had and a ton of pirated PC games were in it. Of course I would've rather purchased it from an EBgames back at home legitimately, but I'm in China...a country where it's hard a fuck to find exactly what you want. Who would've thought? I guess that's one great thing about America. When you have money and you want to blow it, the country's commercialistic design totally caters to your wants and needs.

In a one liner: This game was hella fun. It's good to see these FPS moving away from WWII. It's always fun to kill some Germans, but that gets old after a decade or so of the same crap.

The game played just like a movie, except you're in it. It had very intense game play, partnered with the music and atmosphere to back up everything. The visuals were good, except I had to turn down a ton of settings to have it work at my native resolution. The weapons were great, especially this anti-tank launcher called a Javelin. Oh God was it fun to shoot this thing. The first person campaign was a little short, but it was definitely well-designed. I don't play multi-player, so I didn't test any of that out. I'll be keeping this as my de facto test game when I get a new vid card or some other hardware.

I see that this game also got released to the 360. By all means, get it. It's very fun and well worth the money...and then you can sell it.
Rating - High

Bee Movie (Animated 2007)

It's been quite a while since Jerry Seinfeld did anything in film or television, but why did he decide to use this movie that he wrote as some sort of catapult to get back into the game? He really should make another TV show because that is where I think his career started and ended.

This movie was made by Dreamworks, so that automatically says two things about it: they have a huge budget to play with and the story will be overly-simplistic, highly predictable, and totally linear. Whenever Dreamworks makes a film, it always turns out to be blah. After watching this, I immediately thought of Madagascar, because it also had non-memorable characters, visual overkill, and a boring plot.

I know I'm not 10 anymore, but would I actually have been entertained by this when I was that age? Let's hope not because it wasn't that good.
Rating - C

Lawrence of Arabia (Drama 1962)

They sure don't make movies like they used to, and thank God for that. This was one of those films that you always heard about but never saw because they were considered a classic and you just didn't have time for those types of slow movies.

Since there was a huge lull in new DVDs being supplied by the DVD man, I had to resort to these types of measures in order to remain entertained. Hopefully I won't have to do this again, because I just don't have the patience to watch super-long movies with a fixed intermission in the middle.

To start out, I do respect the peeps who made this because they didn't have computers and nice CG stuff to artificially create landscapes and armies. They had to do it the old school way, which was to go on location, have a shit ton of extras, and having very expensive takes to get the needed shots. While the cinematography was top notch, considering the year it was made, the acting lacked realism and passion.

The plot was fairly solid, so at least it was well written, but Peter O'Toole was just that...a tool. He always seemed to be overacting and making crappy facial expressions to show that he was disillusioned or going mad. I didn't find him convincing at all, and because he was the main character in the film, that made the whole thing stink a little. Maybe back in the early 60s this type of acting was standard, but these days it is not.

I felt like I wasted many hours of my life by watching this...I was neither educated nor entertained. Not all Arabs can speak English either...
Rating - C

Wednesday, November 14, 2007

Day Night Day Night (Drama 2006)

This was a silent indie film that I saw a trailer for over a year ago. It essentially followed around a girl who was preparing to be a suicide bomber in New York. It took a very calm, analytical approach to the factor of time, as the main female actor went through the hoops to get to her final destination.

The feel of the movie was much like United 93. There was minimal talking and a lot of drawn-out, observational scenes. From the audience's point of view, you got to feel what emotional anxieties existed for the girl at different parts of the film.

It was a different type of movie, but not necessarily good or bad. Depending on one's point of view, it could go both ways. I personally thought it was O.K., but there was no Eureka at the end of the tunnel.
Rating - C

Tuesday, November 13, 2007

Shoot 'Em Up (Action 2007)

I'm not totally sure if this movie even made it into theaters, but a friend of mine did mention it a few months back. This film was definitely unique even though the action became way too repetitive after the first 10 minutes.

I don't even know how I'm supposed to describe this movie because it was all over the place, sorta like Pulp Fiction only with less story. It did have an
all-star cast, as well as plenty of guns, but it just wasn't entertaining.

Good try in making something different, but next time don't use Michael Davis as the writer and director.
Rating - D

Monday, November 12, 2007

The Great Raid (Action 2005)

Well there is certainly a reason why nobody ever heard of this film until it was quickly removed from the theaters. Movies are supposed to have stories, just like most books are supposed to have stories. There is a distinct difference between a documentary and a story with actual characters and a plot. This film tried to take historical information and turn it into an action drama. It didn't work out all that well.

The movie was about a mission that took place near the end of the Pacific Campaign during WWII. The task was to free a bunch of P.O.Ws from a Japanese prison camp. That's all nice and dandy for something off of the History Channel, but for a movie, they failed to integrate a plot, actors, and character development.

I think Pearl Harbor is a fine example of a historical event that was "Hollywooded" into a feature film. They took one event, added a few fictitious characters, mixed in a fictitious, 3-way love story, and added a crapload of music and special effects. Bam! You have your movie.

Instead of doing the same thing that Michael Bay did, John Dahl did something not worth mentioning. This film was a first person version of a documentary. The narration, actual film clips, and everything in between cannot be considered a movie. The focus of this project was way off base and the director should have seen it from the get-go. Making this event into a movie was a mistake.
Rating - D

Saturday, November 10, 2007

No Reservations (Drama 2007)

Well you can't get any more average than this movie was. If you've seen the trailers then you already know what this film is all about. Nothing is actually gained by watching the drama play out on screen. Aaron Eckhart rarely gets any leading rolls, but he held his own for this one. Catherine Zeta-Jones hasn't been in a real film in a very long time, so this was probably something small to get her back on the horse.

Besides money, I'm still baffled as to why she decided to marry Michael Douglas. Nasty...just old and nasty.
Rating - C

Friday, November 09, 2007

American Gangster (Crime Drama 2007)

It's been a while since someone produced a great, solid film, but now we have one. This was a pretty sharp movie. It seemed a whole lot more realistic than Scarface, mainly in regards to plot, but the actual premise was very much the same. It does go to show that corruption is everywhere all of the time.

Both Denzel and Crowe performed up to their standard par, so that definitely helped out. I didn't notice anything bad about this film. It was engaging, interesting, and fairly realistic. I like gangster movies, but I think the crown still goes out to Mobsters or The Untouchables.
Rating - A

Tuesday, November 06, 2007

Home of the Brave (Drama 2006)

I suppose good intentions has to mean something when making a movie, but just that will not carry a film towards success. I felt sorry for this film because I knew what it was trying to do, to bring to light the many mental and emotional problems that war can cause to a soldier; but the way they addressed these problems, it in terms of a movie, was just so bad. The plot was very fragmented, it lacked in-depth character development, and it did not flow like a single story should. It was more like having 4 short stories artificially mushed together.

Samuel L. Jackson is still a great actor, just like Jessica Biel is still a crappy actor, so at least we know that both of their careers aren't flukes. 50 Cent played a stereotypical angry man, who could not deal with the level of self-control needed to be a functional member of civilian society. The new guy, Brian Presley, did a pretty blah job and was not too impressive.

Kudos goes out to what the writer and director "tried" to do, but in the end their efforts were wasted. They concentrated way too hard on displaying the extremes of emotional war wounds. This changed the film from being a realistic movie, into a very exaggerated one, and it was not convincing at all.
Rating - D

Monday, November 05, 2007

Chinese Lessons: Five Classmates and the Story of the New China by John Pomfret (Nonfiction Book 2006)

It's funny how after spending a few weeks in a country where you can't read a damn thing, you will pretty much pounce on anything with English written in it. I've purchased a few newspapers here, but they were all hella simplified and were specifically written for a Chinese audience trying to learn English. One of the older teachers here had this book in his collection and after reading the premise, I was hooked.

The story is crazy stuff. A few years after China "opened up", the author, in his last years of undergrad, applied to be a foreign student in a University here in China. In a nutshell that meant that he would be one of the first white guys to step foot in this country in a very long time and that he would allowed to directly mingle with the locals in his same age category. This was such a big deal because this country had been locked down for so many decades, kinda like how North Korea currently is. The author got over to China, adjusted to the lifestyle here, integrated into the student body, made a good number of friends, and stayed in contact with them through their careers. Now all of his former roommates/classmates are businessmen, party officials, army officers, writers, and teachers.

Because of the fact that he was able to shoot the shit with them during their 20s, he got the hear a bunch of stories relating to their lives growing up, their parents' stories, and even some grandparents' stories. The importance of these stories lies in the fact that there were two very important things that happened to China after the 1940s: The Great Leap Forward and The Cultural Revolution.

I didn't know much about either of these things prior to coming over here because my Chinese courses in college were pretty much about historical ancient China. From what I gather, these two events killed millions of peeps had maintained a continuous reign of chaos for many years.

A comparison I like to make is if all of the Evangelical Christians in the US went ape shit and started killing people and pullin' federally sanctioned Inquisition type stuff throughout the country. Without the support of the cops or the military, most people would be forced to fend for themselves. But one good thing about our country is that we have guns, so if something like China's Cultural Revolution happened in the US, I would probably just drive to a gun shop, load up on ammunition, and sack up.

Of course we also tend to question many things, including the government, so we would hope that the majority of us would not be like sheep, although look at the situation we're currently in...

But back to the book. All in all it was a very interesting read because it was about real people, real stories, and real history. This guy lived in this country for many years and accumulated a ton of information right from the horse's mouth. I believe that's a very hard thing to pull off because people here really don't reveal stuff about themselves and because a lot of stuff is censored.
Rating - High

Saturday, November 03, 2007

Lust, Caution (Chinese Foreign Drama 2007)

Well this was officially the first movie I've seen in a theater in this country. Luckily, it had English subtitles so some peeps out there at least recognize that a small portion of movie-goers can't fully understand Chinese.

This film was about intrigue and methodical planning. The main chick, Wei Tang, was an insanely good actor. Because there were so many silent facial scenes, she did an incredible job keeping up her "game face". I was impressed. The other people in the movie were all side dishes in comparison to her.

The plot was good, but very slow, like The Green Mile slow. I wanted to sleep so bad at some points, but not becasue it was boring, just becasue it took forever to move the story along. The ending was very anticlimactic, but I guess it goes hand-in-hand with Ang Lee's subtle art direction.

If you're into well done, slow-paced movies, then you might have the patience for this one. Most people I know would not be able to get through it though.
Rating - B

Wednesday, October 31, 2007

Miami Vice (Action 2006)

Well look what we have here, Colin fucking Farrell; but this time he's sporting an 80's style mullet, aka "business in the front, party in the back".

This film was all over the place. You first had one group of bad guys which then lead to another group of bad guys, and then it finished off with one crappy love triangle happening with Li Gong, mullet-boy, and some Columbian drug dealer.

Whoever did the casting really needs to be relieved of his responsibilities. How often do you have an Asian chick in Columbia? Humm, probably never. Now add a bunch of Hispanic guards surrounding this Asian chick who is speaking with a very heavy Chinese accent. Seem a little odd? It sure did to me.

I could go on and on, but I won't. Jamie Foxx has to be more selective about the movies he chooses to do or else his fame from great films like Ray and Any Given Sunday will be soon forgotten.
Rating - D

Snakes on a Plane (Action 2006)

What a silly movie. This reminded me of the corny shit that they pulled in Deep Blue Sea, so much so that good ol' Samuel L. Jackson even had another one of this emphatic monologue sessions.

After watching this, I still don't know why the producers chose to have such an odd marketing scheme when they first released it. Some of you may remember what they did in terms of having very short teasers.

So yeah, as you might've guessed this movie is about what happens when you have buttloads of crazy, poisonous snakes on a transpacific airline flight. They should have placed this in the comedy section because I laughed more than anything else. Silly and stupid are the main adjectives that come to mind, but it was a little entertaining nonetheless.
Rating - C

Monday, October 29, 2007

Samsung SGH-E900

After being here only a few weeks, I caved and purchased a cell phone just because I totally felt naked without one. Hopefully soon, technology will reach the point where we won't need keys for cars, keys for houses, or even cash, because everything will be integrated into one's cell phone. I think Japan is already very close to having this system in place, and I think it already does exist in terms of public transportation.

I got this phone for $1400 RMB which equals $187 USD. I think it was a pretty good purchase just because I could, at last, try out a slider phone that has recently become more popular in the US. The features included in this model are pretty standard, from having a color screen, to being able to play MP3s, to having Bluetooth, etc. I've been texting a whole lot more since it's much cheaper to text than to call someone over here. Also, they don't have service plans like we have in the states. I pay around $3USD per month and I get 150 text messages and around 200 voice minutes. You get charged on a fixed per minute/message rate extra after you go over. Also, all of the services are region-based, so those roaming charges that we all used to get in the US are alive and well over here. If I leave Yanjiao and head into Beijing, a voice call jumps up from $.03USD/min to $.27USD/min. Of course that is nothing compared to US prices, but for the people here, it's a lot of money. One good thing is that mandatory 1-2 year contracts don't exist so people upgrade phones all the time.

One weird thing that we all take for granted is that voicemail is not included in any of the "normal" plans. You have to pay extra and any other feature besides voice and text messages.

Design
The phone itself is light and sleek. One fancy feature is that the area around the directional pad is touch/heat sensitive, meaning that I don’t actually press a button to activate a key. Good thing is that it's fancy. Bad this is that you always accidentally activate buttons when you never intend to do so. It gets very annoying…very. The only comparison I have with this is with laptops, where you can accidentally activate the touchpad and end up typing in a location where your mouse cursor is. Pretty much everyone who has used a laptop to type a paper knows what I'm talking about.

Keypad
The main keypad is of good size. Not too big and not too small. Texting is easy and it gives your fingers pretty good feedback.

Connections/Buttons
On the left side of the phone you have your run-of-the-mill volume buttons. On the bottom is a slot for a MicroSD card. I used a 512MB chip with it and it works just like it should. On the right side of the phone you have your main power button and two extra buttons: one is dedicated to turn the phone into camera-taking mode and the other is to initiate the music player. The right side also has an input to recharge the phone or to connect a headset/microphone combo to it. An annoying part of this is that you have to move this little plastic tab in order to recharge the phone. This is the stupidest design ever. Who wants to move this flimsy piece of plastic every time you want to recharge your phone? Nokia is still the best in regards to having interchangeable power adapters.

Battery
The default battery is listed as 800mAh with a 220h standby time and a 3h 30min talk time. The battery life seemed to be on par with other phones I’ve used in the past.

Software
The OS software is pretty fast and intuitive. It only came with 2 games, but it does have a converter program which I’ve used a lot. The music player is kinda blah. The controls are good, but that damn headset connector is so annoying to use and it totally sticks out from the phone when connected. I still think it’s easier to just use a separate mp3 player instead of trying to use your phone as one.

Overall
After using this celly for a few months, I can say that the novelty of having a slider phone has worn off. I’ve used clam shell phones, bar phones, and now slider phones, and I'd have to say that bar phones are the best in my opinion. One good thing is that all cell phones over here are unlocked GSM ones, so I'll be able to easily sell it when I’m finished with it here.

Tigerland (War Drama 2000)

Colin Farrell is and will always be a turd. He's a perfect example of a guy who is way too arrogant for his own good. This movie is yet another role that he can play well because he doesn't really have to act.

The plot of this movie follows around a group of recruits during the Vietnam War. I guess there was this place called Tigerland, which was a training area in the States that got soldiers acclimated to what was in store for them when they reached Nam.

This was a toned-down version of Full Metal Jacket in respects to what getting yelled at by drill sergeants was all about. Of course that film was on a way different level than this one. The story mainly concentrated on Colin Farrell's character as he was a smartass who got in trouble a lot, but was essentially a good person who tried to help out his fellow peeps. It was an O.K. movie that didn't require much thinking.
Rating - B

Friday, October 26, 2007

Logitech Premium Notebook Headset (Random Product)

I purchased these bad boys right before I left the US. I mainly picked this model becasue it came with a case and becasue of its marketed portability. I've tested it out for a few months now, and they are actually pretty good. The earpieces are comfortable enough, the microphone can be retracted in case you're not using it, and everything does stay nice and snug in its plastic case.

The unit came with a stereo to USB connector for both the earphone and the mic, but this turned out to be very bulky and not much of an improvement over the analog lines. For one reason or another, when using the USB, it tends to mess up and stop working with no apparent cause. I've only used it with Skype, so I don't know if it's a hardware problem or a software one. I've since stopped using the USB connector and everything has been fine. The volume control and mute is very useful, as Logitech has put that feature on most of their headsets.

Overall it's a pretty good unit, but it does cost around $45, which is 3x more expensive than a cheaper model that I also own. When comparing the two, it's hard to justify the premium that you pay for the "portability" of the more expensive headset. There really is no difference in quality, both in construction and sound. If you're not a frequent traveler who needs their headset protected in a nifty plastic case, then you're totally better off by just going for the cheaper model.


Lucky Number Slevin (Action 2006)

This movie started out pretty shitty but it ended up being an O.K. flick. Yeah I was almost about to turn it off 15 minutes into it. That was how boring the beginning of it was.

I personally think that this was Josh Hartnett's best acting gig to date. He wasn't all that impressive in anything else he has been in like Pearl Harbor, 40 Days and 40 Nights, or Wicker Park. But in this film, he actually seemed to have a wee bit of talent; who would've thought.

The story gets better towards the middle and it peaks at end. Yes, it's one of those movies, kinda like The Sixth Sense in that regard. I swear I'll never understand where some of these writers get their ideas. I'm certainly not on the same creative wavelength with theses folks.

Although the film is a no-name one that you see at Blockbuster and quickly bypass, I'll reiterate that it's not half bad; not memorable of course, but still O.K.
Rating - B

Thursday, October 25, 2007

The Piano (Drama 1993)

3 Oscars back in 1994? Are you kidding me? This film sucked so bad that I actually sat here for 3 whole minutes because I was that baffled at what I read. How could so many people think that this piece of shit was any good? Do they realize that the whole plot revolved around adultery? I don't care if the chick was mute, that doesn't make her decision to be a skank any less disgraceful.

Besides my very one-sided view on this subject, the movie really did suck. It didn't have a concrete plot, young Anna Paquin didn't know how to act, and the music all came from a 19th century, boring-ass piano. This DVD will be in the big garbage can at the bottom of my apartment in about 10 minutes.
Rating - F

Wednesday, October 24, 2007

Scarface (Action 1983)

Now I can see why so many consider this film to be a classic. Surprisingly enough, I've never actually seen this movie even though it was mentioned a bunch of times while I was growing up. People always thought that I would like it, but I was a tad apprehensive because people also thought I would like Fight Club, which I certainly did not.

Considering that this movie was made in 1983, you gotta give the peeps responsible for it some credit; it was a pretty good movie. We have a great lead actor, an interesting story, and a whole lot of guns and violence. Yes, the music totally sounded like the soundtrack to CHiPs, but again, we're talking about 1983. I don't think I could even talk at that age.

One interesting thing that I saw from the poster was that Oliver Stone wrote the screenplay for this. I find that really hard to believe since that talentless schmuck is the man responsible for such craptastic movies like Alexander, U Turn, and Natural Born Killers. To this day, I won't accept that he directed Platoon and Any Given Sunday because those movies were so damn good. It must've been the drugs...

Anyway, this was a solid action flick that showed how power can corrupt. I don't think anyone else has made such an in your face example of this. I'd like to believe that if I ever made it big, I would still go to Costco/Sam's Club to by my socks. You can never go wrong by bargain shopping in bulk.
Rating - A